Tegrity.AI

AI integrity and structural awareness. 67 cards and sources.

Configurar el asistente · Reading guide

Cards and sources

1. Tegrity.AI Card · Original
2. Privacy Policy Card · Original
3. Legal Notice Card · Original
4. Regime Awareness Technology Component Roadmap Card · Original
5. Contact Card · Original
6. Field Notes Card · Original
7. Regime-Aware Semantic Windows: Proposal for Mathematical Assessment and Empirical Validation Card · Original
8. Structural Awareness Foundation Validation Card · Original
9. Regime Awareness Roadmap (Legacy Redirect) Card · Original
10. Tegrity.AI Card · Original
11. Research Contributions Card · Original
12. Research Initiatives Card · Original
13. Industry Reference Group Card · Original
14. Research and Publication Policy Card · Original
15. AI Integrity: a Critical Frontier Card · Original
16. AI Integrity Architecture: Toward Expert-System Envelopes Around Statistical AI Card · Original
17. Structural Limits of Current AI Integrity Under Regime Change Card · Original
18. From Complicated to Complex: The AI Safety Paradox Card · Original
19. Human Intelligence Debt Card · Original
20. The Case for AI Integrity Management as a Formal Enterprise Function Card · Original
21. One Function or Many? The Case For and Against Unified AI Integrity Management Card · Original
22. The Semantic Tug-of-War: The Turf War for AI Oversight and the Case for “AI Integrity Management” Card · Original
23. The Harvester Multiplication Problem: Capability Fragmentation, Governance Collapse and the Compounding of Human Intelligence Debt Card · Original
24. The Human Intelligence Debt Dilemma: A Game-Theoretic Account of Why Rational Agents Build Irrational Architectures Card · Original
25. Regime Awareness: Capability Development Across Four Field Cases Card · Original
26. Architectural Entropy: How Mediated Systems Spend Human “Exergy” and the Partial Irreversibility of Human Intelligence Debt Card · Original
27. Existence, Constructive Realizability, Operational Maximality, Safety Governance, and the Contextual Boundary Problem of a “Sufficiently Good” Detector Card · Original
28. Minimalistic Regime-Aware Early Warning Systems Card · Original
29. The Limits of AI Oversight Card · Original
30. What Cannot Be Recovered Must Be Managed. Cross-series bridge: Human Intelligence Gap with AI Integrity Management Card · Original
31. Evidence Notes for the Proposed Human Intelligence Debt Study Card · Original
32. Measuring Human Intelligence Debt Card · Original
33. When the Problem Isn’t the Technology Card · Original
34. When Asking the Question Changes the Answer Card · Original
35. When You Have to Decide Before You Can Discover Card · Original
36. When Cleaning Up Means Betting Blind Card · Original
37. How to Measure the Cost of Not Knowing Card · Original
38. Is Clarity Getting More Expensive? Card · Original
39. What Goes Unpriced Is Paid in Human Intelligence Card · Original
40. The Minimal Information a Transformation Needs Card · Original
41. The Attribution Gap and Capability Loss Card · Original
42. Bridge: The Attribution Gap and Capability Loss Card · Original
43. Attribution Gap Measurement Protocol Card · Original
44. The Map and The Flow Card · Original
45. Optimization, Coherence, and the Frame Card · Original
46. Why Selection Cannot See It Card · Original
47. The Outlook Card · Original
48. Structural Awareness Card · Original
49. About Cats, Boxes and Enterprise Management Decisions Card · Original
50. Minimum Sufficient Control Architecture for AI Enabled Urban Systems Card · Original
51. From Field Practice to Pre-Standardization: An Extensible Case-Study Framework Card · Original
52. When the Controls Work but the System Fails Card · Original
53. Annex 0 — Complete Source and Concordance Card · Original
54. Annex 1 — Six Failure Scenarios Card · Original
55. Annex 2 — Plausibility and Technological Comparison Card · Original
56. Annex 3 — Foundations, Principles and Derivation Card · Original
57. Annex 4 — Canonical Requirements and Test Contract Card · Original
58. Annex 5 — Six Positive Paths and Quality Plans Card · Original
59. Annex 6 — Ablation, Sufficiency and Extensibility Card · Original
60. Annex 7 — Reference Architecture and Implementation Card · Original
61. Annex 8 — Meaning, Contribution and Limits Card · Original
62. Annex 9 — Claims and Evidence Appendix Card · Original
63. Annex 10 — Collaboration Guide Card · Original
64. Annex 11 — Complete Map of Sources and Links Card · Original
65. Summary — When the Controls Work but the System Fails Card · Original
66. De la dependencia sufrida a la solidaridad elegida Card · Original
67. From Endured Dependence to Chosen Solidarity Card · Original

Relationships dentro del clúster

• T874 → T1472 · analogy only. Reducing compensatory human work and improving capability recognition are distinct outcomes that require separate measures.
• T1415 → T2795 · analogy only. An unresolved fact may call for observation, while an unresolved authority condition may call for a legitimate declaration before action can proceed.
• T1494 → T1400 · candidate transfer. The programme's forecasts become testable only when their indicators, populations, time windows and disconfirming outcomes are specified.
• T1522 → T1396 · analogy only. Information that was never institutionally established differs from information that existed but cannot be recovered from the available record.
• T2803 → T1400 · candidate transfer. Task simulations could vary integration, data quality and expert support separately to examine which assumptions drive a human-work counterfactual.
• T2811 → T1499 · analogy only. A shared conceptual programme does not make evidence from one research branch a validation of the others.
• T3083 → T2795 · analogy only. Voluntary cooperation can preserve each participant's knowledge limits and decision rights while making shared action more intelligible.
• T874 → T1400 · documented use. The task-level protocol operationalizes the earlier role-based framework; its time ratios should not be compared with operator ratios without an explicit conversion model.
• T1378 → T1400 · documented use. The recovery coefficient turns the atrophy claim into a bounded question: how much released capacity becomes genuine contribution again for the same capability and cohort?
• T1391 → T1400 · documented use. The oversight-threshold study tests whether added review and reconciliation outweigh removed work, rather than treating guardrail count as a measure of debt.
• T897 → T1400 · candidate transfer. Capability multiplicity is a screening signal; avoidable compensatory work must still be established from task episodes and a credible replacement counterfactual.
• T902 → T1472 · analogy only. The attribution ratchet sharpens one incentive mechanism behind architectural complexity: blame remains attached to the source while credit is captured downstream.
• T1472 → T1475 · documented use. Lineage establishes dependency, while contribution still requires independently evidenced consequences, substitution conditions and a reliable scoring protocol.
• T1475 → T1484 · analogy only. Independent dependency and attribution records provide a concrete comparison for the distinction between found flow and declared representation.
• T1484 → T1487 · documented use. Cross-frame coherence is assessed against an independently specified upstream outcome, making the map–flow argument operational without equating every deviation with value.
• T1487 → T1491 · documented use. Process conformance identifies a path difference; outcome and counterfactual evidence are still needed to establish whether the deviation preserved the upstream result.
• T1491 → T1494 · hypothesis. The forecast becomes testable by asking whether automation creates more compensatory work in processes already dependent on off-map reconciliation.
• T1415 → T1417 · documented use. A bounded provisional declaration can enable discovery without being mistaken for the binding ownership decision that the investigation is meant to inform.
• T1417 → T1427 · documented use. A transformation business case should include the costs of looking, making binding declarations and absorbing their consequences, not only implementation expenditure.
• T1421 → T1475 · analogy only. The cost of obtaining clarity and the contribution of the capability being examined require separate measures and independent interpretations.
• T1419 → T1472 · documented use. The proposed sequence is to reconstruct contribution and replacement consequences before turning ownership clarity into a capability-retirement decision.
• T1425 → T1400 · analogy only. Unpriced clarity may consume human effort, but only the task-level distinction between necessary work and fixable compensation can classify that effort as debt.
• T385 → T1391 · documented use. A perfectly traceable rule chain cannot recover a decision-relevant distinction that input formation has already removed.
• T387 → T1387 · analogy only. A regime signal matters operationally only when its evidence, response window and authorized action are specified, not merely when another alarm layer is added.
• T389 → T2776 · analogy only. Component-level compliance does not establish ecosystem-level integrity when independently governed actors compose their decisions under changing conditions.
• T878 → T886 · documented use. An integrity function can coordinate common decision conditions while retaining the distinct authority and expertise of its constituent disciplines.
• T2729 → T1391 · candidate transfer. Control burden should be compared among configurations that meet the same objective and evidence obligations, including the human response work they create.
• T373 → T878 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [AI Integrity Management as a formal enterprise function](https://tegrity.ai/the-case-for-ai-integrity-management-as-a-formal-enterprise-function/).
• T878 → T886 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The case for and against a unified function](https://tegrity.ai/one-function-or-many-the-case-for-and-against-unified-ai-integrity-management/).
• T886 → T888 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The institutional turf war around AI oversight](https://tegrity.ai/the-semantic-tug-of-war-the-turf-war-for-ai-oversight-and-the-case-for-ai-integrity-management/).
• T888 → T385 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The architecture beneath AI Integrity Management](https://tegrity.ai/ai-integrity-architecture-toward-expert-system-envelopes-around-statistical-ai/).
• T385 → T387 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The structural limits of integrity under regime change](https://tegrity.ai/structural-limits-of-current-ai-integrity-under-regime-change/).
• T387 → T1387 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Minimalistic Regime-Aware Early Warning Systems](https://tegrity.ai/minimalistic-regime-aware-early-warning-systems/).
• T389 → T2776 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Six constructed system-level failure scenarios](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-but-the-system-fails/).
• T1391 → T874 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The Human Intelligence Debt definitions](https://tegrity.ai/human-intelligence-debt/).
• T1396 → T1391 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The structural limits of AI oversight](https://tegrity.ai/the-limits-of-ai-oversight/).
• T874 → T1400 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Measuring Human Intelligence Debt](https://tegrity.ai/meassuring-human-intelligence-debt/).
• T1399 → T1400 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The proposed measurement study](https://tegrity.ai/meassuring-human-intelligence-debt/).
• T1421 → T1400 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The Human Intelligence Debt measurement stack](https://tegrity.ai/meassuring-human-intelligence-debt/).
• T1423 → T1427 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The flagship account of transformation information](https://tegrity.ai/the-minimal-information-a-transformation-needs/).
• T1425 → T874 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Human Intelligence Debt: definitions and scope](https://tegrity.ai/human-intelligence-debt/).
• T1474 → T1400 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The separate Human Intelligence Debt measurement proposal](https://tegrity.ai/meassuring-human-intelligence-debt/).
• T1494 → T1499 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The four-series Structural Awareness programme](https://tegrity.ai/structural-awareness-program/).
• T1522 → T1415 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [When asking the question changes the answer](https://tegrity.ai/when-asking-the-question-changes-the-answer/).
• T1387 → T1513 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The H1–H3 mathematical and empirical validation proposal](https://tegrity.ai/regime-aware-semantic-windows-mathematical-validation/).
• T1379 → T1387 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The maintained early-warning working paper](https://tegrity.ai/minimalistic-regime-aware-early-warning-systems/).
• T1518 → T1475 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The Attribution Gap measurement protocol](https://tegrity.ai/attribution-gap-meassurement-protocol/).
• T250 → T1513 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The next semantic-window assessment](https://tegrity.ai/regime-aware-semantic-windows-mathematical-validation/).
• T2744 → T2729 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The bounded urban-control case](https://tegrity.ai/minimum-sufficient-control-architecture-for-ai-enabled-urban-systems/).
• T2776 → T2931 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [A concise summary of the Ecosystem Awareness case](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-but-the-system-fails-summary/).
• T2931 → T2776 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The full foundation article](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-but-the-system-fails/).
• T2780 → T2822 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The complete source and link map](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-11-complete-map-of-sources-and-links/).
• T2788 → T2814 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Claims, evidence and the limits of the comparison](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-9-claims-and-evidence-appendix/).
• T2792 → T2795 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Canonical requirements and the test contract](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-4-canonical-requirements-and-test-contract/).
• T2795 → T2799 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The six positive paths and their quality plans](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-5-six-positive-paths-and-quality-plans/).
• T2799 → T2803 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Ablation, sufficiency and bounded extensibility](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-6-ablation-sufficiency-and-extensibility/).
• T2803 → T2811 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [What the results establish and what remains open](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-8-meaning-contribution-and-limits/).
• T2811 → T2814 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The claim-and-evidence reading key](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-9-claims-and-evidence-appendix/).
• T2814 → T2822 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The source concordance and version links](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-annex-11-complete-map-of-sources-and-links/).
• T2818 → T1726 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The AI Integrity Management Industry Reference Group](https://tegrity.ai/industry-reference-group/).
• T2822 → T2694 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Research and publication policy](https://tegrity.ai/research-publication-policy/).
• T3068 → T3083 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Read this contribution in English](https://tegrity.ai/from-endured-dependence-to-chosen-solidarity/).
• T3083 → T3068 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Leer esta contribución en español](https://tegrity.ai/de-la-dependencia-sufrida-a-la-solidaridad-elegida/).
• T3083 → T2776 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [The Ecosystem Awareness foundation and its limits](https://tegrity.ai/when-the-controls-work-but-the-system-fails/).
• T3083 → T874 · editorial comparison. For a complementary reading, see [Human Intelligence Debt: a bounded architectural research question](https://tegrity.ai/human-intelligence-debt/).